Territorial Cataloging
Cataloging of territory, mapping systems, GIS, planning and town-planning
Territorial planning is a rather generic term to define all those technical and normative instruments aimed at its correct management.
The territory, however, is a complex whole which can be compared to a four-dimensional matrix (the three spatial dimensions + time) which is alive, evolves and becomes modified following the laws of thermodynamics.
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
1.1- Social fabric | 1.1.1- social fabric, continuous | |
1.1.2- social fabric, discontinuous | ||
1.2-areas of commercial industries and transport | 1.2.1- industrial or commercial areas | |
1.2.2- road networks and binary and tertiary associates | ||
1.2.3-port areas | ||
1.2.4- airports | ||
1.3- mines, dumps and building sites | 1.3.1- areas of mineral extraction | |
1.3.2- dumps | ||
1.3.3- construction sites | ||
1.4- areas with artificial vegetation | 1.4.1- green urban areas | |
1.4.2- sport and free time structures | ||
2.1- Sowed areas | 2.1.1- non-irrigated sowed areas | 2.1.1.1- intensive cultivation |
2.1.1.2- extensive cultivation | ||
2.1.2- permanently irrigated land | ||
2.1.3- rice fields | ||
2.2- permanent crops | 2.2.1- vineyards | 2.2.1.1- vineyards |
2.2.2-orchards and minor fruits | 2.2.2.1- almond groves | |
2.2.2.2- apple groves | ||
2.2.2.3- pear groves | ||
2.2.2.4- citrus fruit groves | ||
2.2.2.5- nut groves | ||
2.2.2.6- etc. | ||
2.2.3- olive groves | ||
2.3- pasture | 2.3.1- pasture | |
2.4- heterogeneous agricultural areas | 2.4.1- annual crops associated to permanent cultivations | |
2.4.2-complex cultivation | ||
2.4.3- land occupied principally by agriculture | ||
2.4.4- areas of cultivation on land and forests | ||
3.1- forests | 3.1.1- forests of broad-leaved trees | |
3.1.1.1- with a prevalence of holm-oak or cork oak | ||
3.1.1.2- with a prevalence of deciduous oaks | ||
3.1.1.3- mixed, with a prevalence of mesophile and mesothermophile broad-leaves | ||
3.1.1.4- with a prevalence of chestnuts | ||
3.1.1.5- with a prevalence of beech | ||
3.1.1.6- with a prevalence of species of hydric plants | ||
3.1.1.7- plantations with a prevalence of non-native broadleaves | ||
3.1.2- forests of conifers | 3.1.2.1- woods with a prevalence of Mediterranean pines | |
3.1.2.2- woods with a prevalence of oromediterraneo mountain pines and | ||
3.1.2.3- woods with a prevalence of white and/or red firs | ||
3.1.2.4- woods with a prevalence of larches and/or stone pines | ||
3.1.2.5- woods and plantations with a prevalence of non-native conifers | ||
3.1.3- mixed forests | 3.1.3.1.1- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of holm oaks or cork oaks | |
3.1.3.1.2- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence ofdeciduous oaks | ||
3.1.3.1.3- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of mesophile and mesothermophile broad-leaves | ||
3.1.3.1.4- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of chestnuts | ||
3.1.3.1.5- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of beeches | ||
3.1.3.1.6- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of species hydric plants | ||
3.1.3.2. Mixed Forests prevalence of conifers | ||
3.1.3.2.1- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of Mediterranean pines | ||
3.1.3.2.2- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of oromediterraneo mountain pines and | ||
3.1.3.2.3- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of white and/or red firs | ||
3.1.3.2.4- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of larches and/or stonepines | ||
3.1.3.2.5- Mixed woods consisting of conifers and broadleaves with a prevalence of non-native conifers | ||
3.2- Grassy and/or shrubby areas | 3.2.1- natural prairie | |
3.2.2- moors and heaths | ||
3.2.3- schlerophyll vegetation | ||
3.2.4- transition between woody and shrubby land | ||
3.3- open spaces with little or no vegetation | 3.3.1- beaches, dunes and sand plains | |
3.3.2- bare rock | ||
3.3.3- areas with hardly any vegetation | ||
3.3.4- burnt areas | ||
3.3.5- glaciers and areas of perennial snow | ||
4.1- inland humid lands | 4.1.1- inland marshland | |
4.1.2- peat-bogs | ||
4.2- humid coastal lands | 4.2.1- salt marshes | |
4.2.2- salt pans | ||
4.2.3- intertidal plains | ||
5.1- inland water areas | 5.1.1- rivers and streams | |
5.1.2- bodies of water | ||
5.2- seafront waters | 5.2.1- coastal lagoons | |
5.2.2- estuaries | ||
5.2.3- seas |
It is clear that to a territorial study geared to a programme of territorial planning or a revision of town-planning must be added a series of further research which can be summarised in the following table:
The territory and its history
The agricultural system
Statistical and socio-economical research
Climate analysis
Flora and vegetation analysis
Fauna analysis
A map which recognises the land
A morphological map
A map of land use (following the previous methodology)
A map of the infrastructure
A map of the Unity of the Landscape
Further maps and elaborations can give a more complete picture of the work in question but they must always be correlated to the particular aims set by the study.
Suggested rates of reference:
Analyzed Territory | Euro Rates | ||
Ha | Euro per Ha | Total | |
Untill to | 500 | 27 | 13.500 |
“ | 1.000 | 20 | 20.000 |
“ | 2.000 | 13 | 26.000 |
“ | 5.000 | 8 | 40.000 |
“ | 10.000 | 5 | 50.000 |
Untilo to and > | 20.000/strong> | 4 | 880.000 |
The aforesaid honoraria they go added repayable expenses according to the tariff official. In the case in which a greater detail is demanded, for the calculation of the following honorarium it is proceeded applying to the previous increases table:
Scale 1: 5.000 – more 30 %;
Scale 1: 2.000 – more 50 %.
The intermediate values are estimated obviously for linear interpolation.
Guido Bissanti
Bibliography
A.A.VV. (1999) – Il Governo del territorio – modello di pianificazione – Atti del I Congresso dei Dottori Agronomi e Forestali della Sicilia. Altavilla Milicia (PA) 21 Maggio 1999 –
AA. VV. (1997) – Lo sviluppo rurale sostenibile – Atti del X Congresso Nazionale dei Dottori Agronomi e Forestali. Vieste 12 – 14 Giugno 1997 –
Agnelli P. Foggi B. Rossi R. Sposino P. Tarducci F. (1993) – Analisi e Cartografia dell’ecologia del paesaggio. Genio Rurale n° 9: 9-17. Settembre 1993. Edagricole Bologna
Bagnaresi U. (1997) – Pianificazione e gestione ecologica del territorio agro-forestale. Genio
Bissanti G. (1999) – Sviluppo rurale e rinascimento politico – Nuova Ipsa Palermo.
Brullo S., C. Marceno: Contributo alla conoscenza della classe Quercetea ilicis in Sicilia – Not. Fitosociologico n. 19 (11) 1984
Brullo S. 1984: Contributo alla conoscenza della vegetazione delle Madonie (Sicilia settentrionale).
Bollettino Accademico Gioenia Scienze Naturali 16(322): 351-420
Catalano M. (1995) – Caratterizzazione agro-ecologica di zone mediterranee – Metodologia.
Catalano M. Rubino P. (1995) – Caratterizzazione agro-climatica di zone mediterranee.
Curatolo G. (1998) – La Programmazione Territoriale – L’EPOS Palermo.
De Nardo A. Dal Sasso P. (1995) – La cartografia nell’analisi e pianificazione dei sistemi agricolo forestali. Genio Rurale n° 10: 33-52. Ottobre 1995 – Edagricole Bologna.
Di Giulio A. (1995) – Gli indicatori rurali: strumenti per l’analisi delle politiche di gestione del territorio. Genio Rurale n° 5: 51 – 55. Maggio 1995 – Edagricole Bologna
Genio Rurale n° 12: 55-62. Dicembre 1992. Edagricole Bologna.
Genio Rurale n° 7/8: 59 – 66. Luglio-Agosto 1995. Edagricole Bologna.
Genio Rurale n° 6: 61 – 64. Giugno 1997 – Edagricole Bologna.
Genio Rurale n° 9: 40 – 44. Settembre 1997 – Edagricole Bologna.
Gentile S. (1968): Memorie illustrative della carta della vegetazione naturale potenziale della Sicilia.
Guerrieri G. e Nardi V. (1997) – Le politiche internazionali e nazionali sullo sviluppo sostenibile del bacino mediterraneo con particolare riferimento alla lotta alla desertificazione.
INEA – Lo sviluppo rurale – L’ambiente come risorsa per lo sviluppo integrato delle aree rurali. Quaderno informativo n. 5. – Gennaio 1997 –
Ist. Botanico lab. critt. Università di Pavia – Quaderno 40: 1-114
La Mantia A., Gianguzzi L., 1999 – La Quercia spinosa in Sicilia – Sicilia Foreste (6) 21/22: 2-10, Azienda Foreste Demaniali della Regione Siciliana. Palermo.
Marcenò C., Raimondo F.M., 1972 – Sulla presenza della Quercus calliprinos Webb nella Sicilia nord-occidentale. – Nuovo giornale botanico italiano, 106: 290-291.
Pignatti – Flora d’Italia – Ed agricole
Raimondo F.M., Fici S., Gianguzzi L., Lentini F., Mazzola P., Miceli G., Not R., Ottonello D., Romano S., Schicchi R., 1986 – Atlante iconografico delle piante endemiche o rare della Riserva naturale orientata dello Zingaro. – A.F.D.R.S., pp. 84, Palermo.
Raimondo F.M., Gianguzzi L., Ilardi V., 1994 – Inventario delle specie “a rischio” nella flora vascolare nativa della Sicilia. – Quad. Bot. Ambientale Appl., 3 (1992): 65-132.
Toccolini A. Angileri V. (1992) – I sistemi informativi per la pianificazione del territorio.