The hidden principle of life

The hidden principle of life: a thermodynamic theory that can transform ecology

Abstract
This article proposes and supports the postulate that living systems and complex ecological systems maintain themselves far from equilibrium thanks to organized energy flows, and the quality of available energy (exergy) can be used as an indicator of their capacity for self-organization and sustainability. Integrating contributions from Bauer, Schrödinger, Prigogine, and Pross, as well as studies on exergy applied to ecology, we show how extended thermodynamic concepts can explain the emergence, maintenance, and complexity of life.

1. Introduction
Modern theoretical biology requires a framework capable of connecting physical principles and complex biological phenomena. The pioneering works of Schrödinger (1944) and Bauer (2024) suggest that life is not a simple accumulation of matter, but a process that maintains internal order and organizes energy flows contrary to thermodynamic equilibrium. In parallel, Prigogine and Nicolis (1982) show that systems far from equilibrium can self-organize into stable, dissipative structures. Finally, the concept of exergy (Jørgensen 1992; Wall & Banhatti 2012; Jørgensen et al. 2007) provides a quantitative measure of useful energy, fundamental for assessing the sustainability and vitality of ecological systems.

2. Postulate
Living systems and complex ecological systems tend to maximize the use of available energy (exergy) to maintain internal order and complexity, in accordance with the principles of thermodynamics of systems far from equilibrium.

3. Conceptual Methodology
Comparative analysis of the main theoretical contributions in biology and thermodynamics (Schrödinger, Bauer, Pross, Prigogine).
Review of approaches to the use of exergy as an ecological indicator (Jørgensen, Nielsen, Wall & Banhatti).
Integrated synthesis of the principles of self-organization and energy dissipation for the formulation of a unified conceptual model.

4. Results
Theoretical support for the postulate:
Bauer (2024) and Schrödinger (1944) highlight that living systems require a constant energy supply to counteract the tendency toward equilibrium, confirming the need for organized energy flows.
Prigogine & Nicolis (1982) demonstrate how systems far from equilibrium generate dissipative structures, confirming the possibility of self-organization driven by energy flows.
Pross (2003) shows how chemical selection in prebiotic phases is guided by kinetic and thermodynamic considerations, consistent with the postulate of optimal use of available energy.

Ecological application:
Exergy allows us to quantify the capacity of ecological systems to sustain vital functions and resilience, linking thermodynamics to sustainability (Jørgensen, 1992; Wall & Banhatti, 2012; Jørgensen et al., 2007).

5. Discussion
The integration of the cited contributions confirms the validity of the postulate: living systems not only exist in a state far from equilibrium, but tend to optimize energy management to maintain complexity and order. This approach allows for:
A unifying explanation for the emergence of life and its evolution.
The definition of quantitative indicators for ecological sustainability (exergy).
The possibility of modeling complex systems in terms of energy flows and dissipative structures.

6. Conclusions
The postulate linking life, energy, and self-organization is supported by a broad body of theory: life and complex ecological systems remain far from equilibrium thanks to the optimal management of available energy, and the thermodynamics of nonlinear systems provides the conceptual tools to understand their dynamics and sustainability.

7. Recommendations for Research in Ecology and Agroecology
– Integrate thermodynamics into ecological models
Incorporate the concept of exergy—the useful energy available for work—as an indicator of ecosystem vitality and sustainability. This approach allows us to assess the self-organizing capacity of ecological systems and their resilience to environmental changes.
– Adopt a systemic and multidimensional approach
Consider ecosystems as complex systems characterized by interactions between biological, physical, and chemical components. This involves analyzing energy dynamics, material flows, and the relationships between organisms and the environment to better understand ecological processes and their impacts.
– Promote diversity and resilience in agricultural systems
Apply the principles of agroecology, such as crop diversification, synergy between agricultural practices, and the enhancement of biodiversity, to develop resilient and sustainable agricultural systems. These principles promote the stability of agricultural ecosystems and food security.
– Encourage knowledge co-creation
Foster collaboration between researchers, farmers, and local communities in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. This participatory approach enriches research with practical and contextualized experiences, improving the applicability and effectiveness of proposed solutions.
– Assess the ecological impact of agricultural practices
Use ecological indicators, such as soil quality, biodiversity, and resource use efficiency, to monitor and evaluate the effects of agricultural practices on the environment. This allows us to identify the most sustainable practices and promote them at the local and global levels.
– Promote inclusive and sustainable agricultural policies
Support policies that incentivize the adoption of agroecological practices, ensuring equitable access to resources and the active participation of local communities. Policies should aim to strengthen the resilience of agricultural systems and promote social justice.
These recommendations aim to guide research towards an integrated ecological paradigm, capable of addressing contemporary environmental and social challenges through a holistic and sustainable approach.

Guido Bissanti

Bibliography:
– Bissanti G., Guccione G., Manachini B., Quatrini P. Sturla A. (2025). Principi e Fondamenti di Agroecologia. ISBN-13 979-1280140401. Medinova. Favara (AG).
– Grandpierre A. (2024). The epoch-making importance of Ervin Bauer’s theoretical biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOSYSTEMS.2024.105179
– Göran Wall G., Banhatti D.P. (2012). Exergy – a useful concept for ecology & sustainability. DOI:10.48550/arXiv.1111.3310
– Jørgensen S.E., (1992). Exergy and ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(92)90069-Q
– Jørgensen S.E., Søren Nors Nielsen S. N. (2007). Application of exergy as thermodynamic indicator in ecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.06.011
– Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1979) La Nouvelle Alliance. Metamorphose de la science. Gallimard. Paris.
– Prigogine I., Nicolis G. (1982). Le strutture dissipative. Auto organizzazione dei sistemi termodinamici di non equilibrio. Sansoni. Firenze.
– Prigogine I. (2002). Termodinamica: dalle macchine termiche alle strutture dissipative (con Dilip Kondepudi). Bollati Boringhieri. Torino.
– Pross A. (2003). The driving force for life’s emergence: kinetic and thermodynamic considerations. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2003.3178
– Schrödinger E. (1944). What Is Life?: with “Mind and Matter” and “Autobiographical Sketches” Cambridge.